When any driver reaches 12 penalty points in any 3 year period, the Court guidelines are an immediate ban of 6 months or more. Prior to considering whether a ban should be imposed, the Court will give the Defendant the opportunity to raise an exceptional hardship argument in order to persuade the Court that a ban should not be imposed.
The only circumstances that can prevent a driving ban at 12 points is a finding of exceptional hardship. It is clear that hardship must be beyond that which would normally be suffered by depriving the Defendant of his licence. It is for the Defendant to establish the severity and degree of hardship and it is for the Court to assess the severity of the implications and to decide whether that amounts to "hardship which is beyond that normally suffered".
It is accepted that when a Defendant loses his licence, hardship will be suffered. However, that would not be regarded as out of ordinary in any particular case and thus would be perfectly foreseeable as a reasonable consequence of the offence committed.
As far as the criminal courts are concerned, there is no statutory definition of exceptional hardship. The general approach is for each individual Court to reach its own conclusion based on the information before it. What is clear is that hardship must be beyond what would be reasonably foreseeable, that it is for the Defendant to prove the severity of the situation and to bring evidence in support.
Loss of job does not automatically amount to exceptional hardship. Some Courts will regard this as a reasonably foreseeable outcome and thus, not "exceptional". However, the implications that arise from the loss of employment and the effect it would have on others could amount to exceptional hardship. Each individual case can be interpreted differently so it is prudent to seek expert legal advice before preparing any submission.
No. The onus is upon the Defendant to present his case to the Court and in order to meet the criteria, a Defendant should expect to be questioned on his submission (regardless of whether it is put forward in person or via an advocate) so a personal attendance is required.
Although there is no reason why a Defendant cannot represent themselves at Court, the fact is that in order to be successful, certain legal criteria must be met, regardless of the Defendant's circumstances. By obtaining advice, the case can be prepared to ensure that it exceeds the requirement imposed by the Court. This is a complicated area of law and many Defendants do not appreciate the issues to be raised and indeed often overlook as being of no significance, reasons that could be persuasive to a Court. This is the only opportunity the Defendant will get to keep his licence and in those circumstances anyone that does not feel confident in addressing the Court, would be wise to have a trained advocate present the case on their behalf.
You can put forward an exceptional hardship submission but you cannot rely upon any reason that was raised to retain your licence by way of exceptional hardship in the 3 years prior to the new hearing.
I would have no hesitation in recommending GQS Solicitors to my family and friends. A proven track record in serious crime, “they successfully defended my mate G.R and he was acquitted of Murder
Dave Courtney O.B.E
Warwick Crown Court
I was charged with serious offences of Kidnap, Firearms and was at risk of receiving a lengthy prion sentence. Thanks to the hard work GQS put into my case, I was found not guilty.
Birmingham Crown Court [July 2017]
I would like to say a massive thank you for representation at the Crown Court. I was found not guilty after trial. Brilliant Team !!
Birmingham Crown Court- June 2017
I was found not guilty of a shooting that I did not commit. Thank you GQS for all your hard work from me and my family.
Birmingham Crown Court- January 2018
I was represented at the police station, thanks for the proper advise, no further action was taken against me.
Solihull Police Station. 7.01.18
My husband was expecting to go to prison for a Fraud offence, against all the odds the Judge went outside the sentencing guidelines and was gave him a suspended sentence. Thanks to the support and advice from GQS we can now carry on living with our lives.
Inner London Court 10.01.18